Thursday, March 8, 2012

Child Abuse: What Is and What Isn't?

    8-year-old Tom spills orange juice all over the living room carpet. His mother comes in after a long, stressful day at work, tells Tom to clean the carpet, and when he refuses, finally spanks him on his backside. Child abuse or not? This is a great problem many people in the country are debating over. Every year, over three million child abuse reports are made in the US. More than five children die each day from abuse. Some say the government should create stronger child abuse laws to prevent this from happening. Others argue that the government has no right to intervene with what goes on inside a household. To solve this dilemma, the United States government should step up, create stronger laws that clearly define child abuse, and protect the children of America.
    There are four types of child abuse: physical, child neglect, emotional, and sexual. Physical abuse is a very controversial type of child abuse. Parents around the United States have different opinions over what is considered okay, and where to draw the line. Physical abuse happens when a child is physically harmed or injured. Whether it is by being beaten, shaken, or bruised, this type of abuse comes in many forms.
Physical abuse can also happen if a parent takes discipline or punishment too far such as “hitting a child with a belt or switch,” comment written by Sydney Newton and Julie Gerrits. Back when some grandparents were children, getting a “whuppin’” or their “hide tanned” was the typical punishment for bad behavior, and parents today still believe it is acceptable. Others argue it is not okay, that it can hurt and humiliate a child, and leaves visible marks. It also has serious negative effects. These children could develop emotional disorders such as anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) later on and have trouble trusting other people (14). Why should a child have to suffer through that? The government should try to give parents the freedom to discipline their child, but also draw a clear line so it doesn’t cross over into abuse.
    Child neglect, a common type of child abuse, is a growing problem in the US.  It occurs when a parent or guardian fails to provide a child’s basic needs or is “physically or mentally unable to care for a child,” adds an article written by Joanna Saison, Melinda Smith, and Jeanne Segal. Most child neglect is due to poverty in a family, and the incapacity of a parent to supply necessities in a household, such as food, education, clothing, shelter, or supervision. This type of abuse can also result from parental substance abuse. “One-third to two-thirds of child abuse and neglect cases involve substance abuse to some degree,” concludes the Childhelp Organization’s article “National Child Abuse Statistics.” Children whose parents abuse alcohol or drugs are three times more likely to be abused and four-times more likely to be neglected.
Some parents may be neglecting their children and may not even know it. They could be battling addictions or have mental illnesses and do not know that what they are doing is wrong. Various forms of neglect are not deliberate, such as a parent leaving her baby in the car for a few minutes under the hot sun where babies may overheat and die. Should this parent face consequences? Certain people say yes because a parent should never leave a baby unattended in any circumstance. Others disagree. They say if a child is lost due to a parent’s careless mistake, the parent has “suffered enough,” implies the article, “Family Law: Child Abuse/ Child Safety/ Discipline.” A few suggest the government require mandatory visits from social workers to all homes where babies are born, to help families who may be unsure of how to take care of a child or need extra help. This is good for teen parents who don’t have the knowledge and skills other women have to take care of their newborns. It also prevents a parent from feeling stressed and taking it out on their new baby, perhaps resulting in the death of their child. “National Child Abuse Statistics” observed that 80% of the children who die each day to abuse are under the age of 4. Having social workers involved in the upraising of some children could possibly lower these numbers and stop innocent children from being attacked.
The third type of child abuse, emotional abuse is equally as destructive as physical abuse. Even if no visible scars are obtained, emotional ones are. Emotional abuse is when a child is called names such as “worthless,” “stupid,” or a “mistake,” or exposing a child to abuse, such as hurting a family member or friend. It also includes “frequent yelling, threatening, or bullying” (Saison, Smith, and Segal). Parents who desire control and power in a household may call a child names to make them feel small and insignificant. These words can cut deep in a child’s heart. If emotionally abused, children can get attachment disorders or suffer from depression which could cause them to have suicidal thoughts. They may also question if they “are worthy of love or affection” (Newton and Gerrits 22).
Emotional abuse occurs often in today’s society without being recognized most of the time. For example, when a coach curses at a player during a match. It is okay for the coach to shout to be heard over the noise, but cursing is crossing over into emotional abuse. However, many people do not consider this abuse since it is very present in the United States. Some say it is “just part of the game” or that the coach “isn’t serious.” On the other hand, it is unacceptable and rude, and can diminish one’s self-worth and self-esteem. Another everyday scenario is when a friend insults one’s appearance. “No offense” and “just kidding” are often used in a way to show one doesn’t mean what they say, but the damage from the insult can mean a lot to the victim. Because of this, it is extremely “easy to overstep the boundaries between teasing and instruction to taunting and abuse” (Newton and Gerrits 21).
Sexual child abuse is a hidden type of abuse. It leaves children feeling overcome with shame. For these reasons, children may be afraid to tell anyone if they have been sexually abused. This type of abuse happens when a child is exposed to sexual situations or material, inappropriately touched, or raped (“Family Law: Child Abuse/ Child Safety/ Discipline”). Newton and Gerrits note that, “25% of women and 5-15% of men were sexually abused as children.” Children who have been sexually abused will forever be scarred. They are more likely to experience anxiety, depression, and PTSD (29).
Sexual abusers these days have many ways to reach kids. Some may be close friends or family of the victim. According to “National Child Abuse Statistics,” 90% of sexual abuse victims know the perpetrator in some way. As more people are using technology, sexual predators are finding easier ways to get their hands on children. For example, several are using social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter to lure kids in to participate in sexual activity.
Sadly, the government does not do much to help these victims, as many of them do not say a word to anyone about the abuse that is occurring. Children often do not tell anyone because they are afraid their parents will get in trouble. Also, “abused children may feel embarrassed, ashamed, or that the abuse is their fault” (Newton and Gerrits 9). Several fear that no one will believe them.
Unfortunately, some parents are falsely accused of abusing or neglecting their child. These false reports can be serious and can send the parents to jail and hurt their reputations for the rest of their lives. Victims of Child Abuse Laws (VOCAL) is a group that hopes to alter laws regarding child abuse to prevent the false accusations and protect parents’ rights (“Family Law”). Many groups like VOCAL say it is too easy for false accusations to be made and children to be removed from their parents. Some reports come from children seeking attention or hoping to avoid reasonable discipline. Others come from parents seeking custody over children during divorce or custody battles. In certain cases, police may manipulate a child to support allegations of child abuse.
Mostly the problem is that people have many views regarding what discipline is and when it crosses over into abuse. All children have the right to feel safe and free from harm regardless of who they are. After all, they are the future generation that will be taking over. If the children of today are being abused, then so will the children of tomorrow. 30% of abused and neglected children will continue the cycle of abuse to their own children (Saison, Smith, and Segal). These children are also 25% more likely to become pregnant in their teen years. “Abused children are 59% more likely to be arrested as a juvenile, 28% more likely to be arrested as an adult, and 30% more likely to commit a violent crime” (Saison, Smith, and Segal).
Children shouldn’t have to feel like doing drugs or crime is the only path for them. They shouldn’t have to suffer from ridicule and harassment at any point in their lives. They should feel loved, accepted, and equal to every other human being in the country. It’s time for the government to step up and support the younger voices in the US and to make the world a better place for them.



Work Cited
Newton, Sydney. Gerrits, Julie. Straight Talk About Child Abuse. New York: Crabtree
Publishing Company, 2011. Print.
Saison, Joanna. Smith, Melinda. Segal, Jeanne. “Child Abuse and Neglect.” Helpguide.
2012. Web. 9 February 2012.
“Family Law: Child Abuse/Child Safety/ Discipline.” eNotes. eNotes. 2003. Web. 14
February 2012.
“National Child Abuse Statistics.” Childhelp. Childhelp Organization. 15 Feb 2012. Web. 15 Feb
2012.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Teens and Driving: Should the Driving Age Be Raised?

When your mom tells you for the 4th time that she’s too tired to drive you to the mall, don’t you wish for the day you turn 16, get your license, and are able to drive yourself anywhere you want to go? Well, that may not happen. State lawmakers in the US are now finding that car crashes are the leading causes of death for teens, and are now debating over whether to raise the driving age to 17 or even 18. What do you think? Should the state driving age be raised?

States Urged to Raise the Driving Age

Source 1:

In their online article, “States Urged to Raise the Driving Age,” CBS News persuades state lawmakers to raise their current driving age to 17 or 18. CBS News’ viewpoint is that making teenagers wait a year or two to drive on the road will save many of their lives from fatal car accidents. The author drives out his purpose by displaying the problem as car crashes being the leading cause of deaths among teenagers, and bringing forth a solution- raising the state driving age, in order to make readers want to immediately solve the problem to decrease the number of driving accidents. Conflicting evidence is given in the article to inform readers of the downside of the argument such as “parents having to chauffeur their teens” and “worrying too much about teen drivers”. The author uses smart, statistical vocabulary such as “studies” and “data”, making the article seem factual and correct. The author also uses logos because the article is mostly statistics involving teen car accidents and benefits from graduated licenses. This source is reliable because it is a website formed by a well-known news station, has few ads, and includes interviews from many scholars.


Driving Age, Raise to 18

Source 2:

            In his web page, “Driving Age, Raise to 18,” Alastair Endersby informs debaters of the dilemma many state lawmakers are facing, whether the driving age should be raised to 18 or not. The site is meant to give debate topics, and is designed in a “pro vs. con” layout and gives facts and thoughts for each side to argue about. Therefore, the author doesn’t have a viewpoint and remains very unbiased, opting out of displaying his opinion through his work. Instead, he has an equal amount of arguments on each side, as not to slant one’s opinion, but to make a fair debate. This also means there is no conflicting evidence, because the author can not have information that goes against his viewpoint which is not given. Instead, Endersby has information that conflicts against one another.
            Based on the “pro vs. con” t-chart, debaters can easily see the different viewpoints of the topic compared and contrasted on the page (the side that wants the driving age to be raised, and the side that doesn’t), making it simple for debaters to choose sides and use the arguments to make their case.
            The article contains neutral vocabulary, probably chosen to prevent a slant or bias in the text. For example, Endersby uses the words “could”, and “would” a lot to show that he is not for one side or for one opinion. It also shows he is not making the decision for others or displaying his viewpoint, he is simply leaving it up to the reader.
            Overall, this sight is somewhat reliable. The author’s background that is put above the t-chart tells readers that Alastair Endersby is a teacher from the United Kingdom who used to coach debate teams. Readers can tell he is not from the US because certain words he uses are misspelled or considered incorrect here in America, such as “behaviour” and “labour”. Also, the date on which this web page was last modified is December of 2008, which means this information may not be completely up to date. However, there are no ads and the site looks very professional.
           

Teenage Driving

Source 3:

            In the article, “Teenage Driving,” Chad H. persuades state lawmakers to keep the driving age at 16. Chad’s viewpoint is that the age of the driver is not the root of the problem and that an older person with the same level of experience is just as likely to get in an accident. He refers to a study done by NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Association) in 2005 showing that 23% of drivers killed between the ages of 15-20 were either drunk or intoxicated. This piece of evidence supports the author’s viewpoint, pointing out that it wasn’t careless, immature driving that caused the accident, but what the teens had done before driving that had.
            The article is formatted in a descriptive structure, as it analyzes the bad aspects of the proposed law changes, but not enough of the good aspects and how it could help benefit young drivers. With that being said, conflicting evidence is given at the beginning of the article when the author includes facts and statistics such as “car accidents have become the leading cause of death for teenagers” and “sixteen year-olds were found to have higher crash ratings than any age of driver”. The author also goes on to give other facts about texting-and-driving in teenagers and teen death numbers. But, however, the author disagrees with this information and argues his viewpoint later on in the article. Chad’s vocabulary is very matter-of-fact throughout his article as he uses phrases such as “face the facts,” “doesn’t matter,” and “put the worries aside,” not to mention his unlimited use of the word “just”. He is definitely trying to slant his article to make it seem like keeping the driving age the same is the obvious choice. If he hadn’t tried to do this, he could easily have eliminated these words from the text.
            The author uses a combination of ethos and logos in his article. Logos is used at the beginning when he is giving statistics on the NHTSA study and giving information on the conflicting viewpoint. For the most part, ethos is used evident by the matter-of-fact vocabulary and the author’s comparison of a new teenage driver to a new 50-year-old driver.
            This source of information is somewhat reliable. The article does not display the date it was last modified, questioning the information received. Is it recent? Does it still apply to today? Also, the author does not include background information on himself, only an initial for his last name. Judging by the website, which is teenink.com, the author is probably still a teenager. It is very easy to hypothesize that the teen’s bias toward changing the driving age definitely showed in his article. However, facts and statistics are also included in the article, although a bibliography wasn’t.
           

Contributors